refactor(skills): EN thin wrappers + shared common, discovery section

skills/codex-consult/SKILL.md

@@ -1,36 +1,12 @@
 ---
 name: codex-consult
-description: Codex second opinion on an artifact — spec, plan, design, document, idea. Iterate to consensus. Use when user says «проверь у кодекса», «спроси codex», "second opinion", "have codex review the spec/plan", or when validating a spec/plan before execution.
+description: Second opinion via Codex on spec/plan/design. Use when user says "second opinion", "have codex review the spec/plan".
 ---
 
 # Consulting Codex
 
-Spawn the `codex` subagent, iterate via SendMessage. Hard limit: 5 rounds.
+Spawn the `codex` subagent, iterate via SendMessage. Hard limit: 5 rounds (see `../references/common.md` for wait-loop/resume).
 
-## First prompt — required parts
-
-- First line — framing for the wrapper: "You are a wrapper around the codex
-  CLI: do not solve the task yourself, launch codex and return its answer +
-  thread_id".
-- `cwd: <absolute path>` — always required (the subagent won't launch codex
-  without it); for a purely textual consultation — the relevant project root.
-- Role, requirements, and the artifact — in a block between markers
-  `=== TASK FOR CODEX ===` and `=== END TASK ===`:
-  - Role: "You are a second opinion, NOT an executor. Don't rewrite the
-    artifact. Return findings with severity, and questions separately."
-  - User requirements — verbatim (what the artifact must satisfy).
-  - The artifact itself: full text or a file path.
-
-## Iteration loop
-
-1. Got findings → evaluate them critically yourself (use
-   superpowers:receiving-code-review, don't agree blindly).
-2. Made changes to the artifact → SendMessage: what you accepted, what you
-   rejected and WHY, plus the updated artifact or diff.
-3. Repeat until "no substantial remarks" or the 5-round limit.
-
-## Finale — summary to the user
-
-- What was agreed and applied.
-- What was rejected and why.
-- Unresolved disagreements, if stuck (the user decides).
+- `cwd:` mandatory; artifact inside `=== TASK FOR CODEX ===` with role "second opinion, not executor" + requirements + artifact text/path.
+- Evaluate findings critically (don't agree blindly), SendMessage with accepted/rejected + why + updated artifact.
+- Finale: agreed/applied, rejected+why, unresolved.